RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Forbes — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 3 sources
Topline The Trump administration refuses to modify the IRS’ controversial settlement with President Donald Trump and formally rescind its “anti-weaponization” fund, Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters Wednesday, even though the Justice Department holding firm on the settlement could derail Todd Blanche’s confirmation as attorney general.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Thursday on whether Blanche’s nomination as attorney general should move forward to a full Senate vote, and with Democrats unilaterally opposing Blanche, every single Republican senator needs to vote for him for his nomination to move forward.
Cornyn and Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., have suggested they could oppose Blanche unless the DOJ makes “written modifications” to the IRS settlement, which included a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization fund” for people who feel the judicial system was “weaponized” against them and an agreement that appears to give Trump, his eldest sons and other parties widespread legal immunity.
Cornyn wants the DOJ to formally rescind the anti-weaponization fund in writing—after Blanche has already claimed in Congressional testimony that the fund is “dead”—and restrict the immunity agreement’s scope, Politico reports , but told reporters Wednesday about the DOJ, “They know what they need to do but they simply refuse to do it.”
The Texas senator cancelled a planned meeting with Blanche on Wednesday morning and said Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, had set a 4 p.m. EDT deadline to determine whether the vote on Blanche will take place Thursday, or if it will get postponed because he doesn’t have the necessary votes.
Tillis later told reporters there has been some progress made and the two sides are “almost there,” however, saying lawmakers and the DOJ have “pretty much agreed to” language around the anti-weaponization fund, though the immunity deal remains more of a sticking point.
The DOJ told Forbes on Wednesday it sent Cornyn’s office a “written proposal” Tuesday and “look[s] forward to further discussion around any outstanding concerns.”
“I haven’t seen a single piece of writing that is responsive to what I’ve requested,” Cornyn told reporters Wednesday. “Maybe they think I’m just going to give up or, you know, go along, but they’re mistaken.”
It remains unclear if the vote on Blanche’s confirmation will take place as scheduled Thursday or if it will get delayed, and whether the DOJ could reach a last-minute agreement that will get Cornyn and Tillis on board. If the vote does get delayed, it remains to be seen whether lawmakers will be able to get it over the finish line and sent to the full Senate before the body begins its August recess on Aug. 10.
Whether more GOP senators could oppose Blanche if and when his nomination makes it to the full chamber. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La.—who, like Cornyn and Tillis, is leaving the Senate at the end of this term—suggested to reporters Wednesday he also still had concerns about Blanche’s nomination. “I have to make sure that he is the attorney general who used to be the president's personal attorney, not the personal attorney who is also the attorney general,” Cassidy said , as quoted by Punchbowl News. The senator said he was concerned about the agency’s “lawfare” in “going after” people who have been critical of the president, adding, “The fact that that's happening has great concern and should concern all Americans. Because where does it stop?”
No—but without the written assurances that Cornyn and Tillis are asking for, it could be revived. Blanche has told lawmakers the fund is “not moving forward,” and a federal judge has paused it, so the Trump administration couldn’t make payments through it right now even if they wanted to. The judge overseeing Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS has also issued a ruling saying the settlement agreement should have never been reached in the first place and essentially nullifying it, but Blanche has suggested the DOJ doesn’t interpret that ruling as formally rescinding the agreement. While Blanche has given lawmakers verbal assurances that the fund is dead, he and other DOJ officials have refused to put that in writing or formally rescind the agreement, which has sparked fears that they could try to revive it if the pause against it in court gets lifted. Reports suggest the Trump administration is also considering other ways to try to get payouts to Trump allies, including Jan. 6 rioters, whether that’s through establishing a new fund or establishing a process to speedily pay out legal settlements.
According to the DOJ , yes. Unlike the anti-weaponization fund, which Blanche backtracked on and said was dead after even Republican senators opposed it, the DOJ has held firm to keeping the immunity agreement in place. In her ruling saying the settlement agreement was improperly reached, Judge Kathleen M. Williams ordered the government not to refer to the “settlement agreement” or use its provisions in any official proceedings. While that should effectively void the immunity deal and prevent it from being used, Blanche has suggested he doesn’t interpret Williams’ ruling that way, answering “yes” when asked by lawmakers whether that provision of the settlement was still in effect. When asked by Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., whether the DOJ and Trump would “abide by” Williams’ order, he said only, “The Department is reviewing the Court’s Order and weighing whether any response by the United States is required.” The agreement says the U.S. is “forever barred” from prosecuting or bringing civil claims against Trump, his two oldest sons, the Trump Organization and other “affiliated individuals” for actions that already happened by the date of the settlement, both tied to the IRS suit and for “any matters currently pending or that could be pending” before other government agencies. Blanche has claimed the deal is more narrow than that language suggests, alleging...
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.