This is one outlet's own report from Fox News — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesThis is one outlet's own report from Fox News — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesSometimes, people are exactly who you think they are. And that may never apply more accurately and comprehensively than it does with Anthony Fauci.
Fauci was portrayed, starting in early 2020, as an objective, brilliant, virtually infallible God-like figure. He was the voice of opposition to President Donald Trump , a clear-eyed force of evidence-driven policy, contrasting with the evil Trump who didn't "listen to the science."
That's not an exaggeration; there were Christmas tree ornaments made up of Fauci dressed as a Pope, shrines put up in people's houses, and he was given a parade of endless, relentlessly glowing media appearances from his fawning, adoring fans. Fans like CNN's Jake Tapper and Dana Bash.
FAUCI'S NEWLY RELEASED COVID DIARIES REVEAL BIZARRE FIXATION ON FAME AS PANDEMIC DEATHS MOUNTED
For most critics, it was clear almost immediately that these portrayals and friendly media appearances were the exact opposite of reality. Fauci was a narcissist. Someone who enjoyed the attention, power, and influence he now unexpectedly wielded. He was unimaginably arrogant, unwilling to listen to new evidence if it contradicted what he wanted to believe. And someone who bought into himself as that virtually infallible, God-like figure.
Well, Sen. Rand Paul over the weekend released a series of diary entries, emails, and inside information from Fauci himself and it turns out that the critics were more right than they could have ever imagined.
There are so many humiliating, embarrassing, discrediting revelations from the emails and diary entries that many are still compiling them. Combing through the list of statements that he made privately, in direct contradiction to his public pronouncements, could be a full-time job. For weeks.
But let's highlight a few, revisit what he said, and explain what it all means.
One of Fauci's most heinous legacies was the push for lockdowns, school closures and mask mandates . Those three policies were and are significant contributors to many of the negative outcomes from our response to the COVID pandemic.
School closures set back an entire generation of children. Lockdowns led to governments printing money to allow people to stay home, setting off a spiral of runaway inflation that is still not under control. And masks permanently damaged millions of people, from school children forced to wear them, to hospital workers who are now indefinitely required to mask in healthcare settings unnecessarily, or for those who continue to mask out of irrational fear and effective propaganda.
DID THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION PURPOSEFULLY IGNORE COVID VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS?
Many of these policies can be traced directly back to Anthony Fauci. And now we have proof of just how inept and incompetent his recommendations were, and how dishonest he was as it became clear he'd failed.
Here's one example. In an email to Deborah Birx , another key architect of our failed response, Fauci unwittingly admitted that he was aware lockdowns and closures did not impact the spread of COVID.
"I have been obsessing about the increases in cases that do not seem to be related to openings or closings or massive crowds,"he wrote. "I believe that ultimately we will see increases related to all of the above; however, right now we may be looking for the lost keys under the light of the lamppost. There is something inherent here that we are missing and that is insidiously keeping the outbreak alive in the USA, and that is more concerning than anticipated spikes associated with identifiable events."
Surely, this email was written in 2021 or 2022, right? After closures and lockdowns became less common?
Nope. June 18, 2020. That's just a few months after the initial shutdowns. He knew in June 2020 that closures did not lead to increases in cases, and for quite literally years afterward, he demanded closures and shutdowns continue. He criticized Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for reopening his state, months later. In September, for example, he said Florida was "asking for trouble" by opening. Three months after he knew, and admitted privately, that closures were not impacting the spread of the virus. Indefensible.
What about masks? Here's another email from April 15, 2020, less than two weeks after the CDC abandoned science and recommended public masking out of panic. Apparently the White House, or then-Vice President Mike Pence did not fully support masks, and Fauci and Birx once again got involved.
"We should push back a bit on the masks. I think that it is important. Since when do comms people dictate public health suggestions? Walk out of the streets and people are wearing them anyway," Fauci wrote. "We should be on board with them. I would be happy to do that tomorrow. We are meeting with the VP tomorrow morning. Can you arrange for you and I to meet with the relevant person so I can give it a pitch?"
No new evidence. No studies to reference. No peer-review. No data. Just, "people are wearing them anyway" and "we should be on board" with the CDC. That's how Fauci decided to push one of the most important and harmful "interventions" of the pandemic. Because everyone else was doing it too.
Then there's the lab leak . By now it's widely accepted that the lab leak is the most likely explanation for the origin of COVID. The Wuhan Institute of Virology proposed doing exactly the type of gain-of-function research that could have led to the creation of an enhanced virus, and did not have proper safety protocols for the work they were doing. As just one example.
Early on in the pandemic, however, the forces of institutional science came together to tell the public that a lab leak was a conspiracy theory. The Wuhan wet market was the source, they said, of a naturally occurring virus. They had no evidence for this suggestion, only speculation and hope to avoid scrutiny of their profession and hopes of avoiding a decrease in funding.
One pivotal moment in the early weeks of the pandemic was ...
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.