RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from ZDNet — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 4 sources
ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.
ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form .
Written by Matthew Miller, Contributing Writer Contributing Writer Aug. 20, 2026 at 2:00 p.m. PT Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
One of the first tests I conduct while evaluating smartwatches is GPS location accuracy -- I want to see how close it can track my actual path. Most of the time, the overall distance is fairly close, but zooming in on the GPS track reveals differences in where I walked. Google focused heavily on improving the accuracy of its location tracking in the Pixel Watch 5 , so I took it out running, walking, and biking with a Garmin Fenix 8 Pro over the past few weeks to compare.
Also: The best smartwatches of 2026: Expert tested and reviewed
Garmin watches have been the standard by which I've measured others over the past many years and they have held up well, particularly in GPS tracking. Obviously there's a significant price difference between the Garmin Fenix 8 Pro -- starting at $950 -- and the Google Pixel Watch 5 at just $400, so we won't get into the value proposition in this discussion.
Let's take a look at Google's accuracy claims and a few other key differences between these two watches.
45x45x12.3 mm
Buy the Google Pixel Watch 5 $429.99 at Amazon 1. You want the most accurate location tracking When the Pixel Watch 5 was announced, Google claimed it outperformed the Garmin Fenix 8 Pro and Apple Watch Ultra 3 for GPS location accuracy. Google says part of this is due to the Pixel Watch 5's compensation for building reflections and satellite reading errors. Given its vast mapping database and understanding of structures, it makes sense that the company has access to data to improve signals in these areas.
Also: I've tested dozens of rugged smartwatches - this one's battery is on a different level
In order to test these claims, I ran through both tree-covered trails and downtown Seattle where tall buildings obscure the sky. My testing with a Garmin Fenix 8 Pro showed that Google's claims are accurate and I was pretty surprised by the strange tracking that showed up on the Garmin watch. I rarely run in big cities, but if you do, the Pixel Watch 5 is likely to provide you with very accurate location tracking.
The overall distance, ascent, and steps measured were about the same, but the track captured by the Pixel Watch 5 matched my real world experiences with the sidewalks and streets I was on during the run. It was impressive how accurate the tracking was, and I look forward to further testing with more watches, as this point alone has made the Pixel Watch 5 the new standard by which to measure against.
People seem to either love or hate the new Google Health Coach. Personally, I'm in the camp of enjoying the conversational nature and extreme customization the AI coach offers. I like that I can have it create weekly training plans that include two or three days of indoor rowing and two days of running. The Garmin Coach plans are not as flexible and customizable, and for those of us that are not serious athletes, we need that adaptability that supports typical daily life.
One way Google stands apart from just about every other smartwatch is its focus on safety. The first Pixel Watch included the basic fall and crash detection features we now see in others. The company also incorporated emergency sharing and Safety Check. Note that the Safety Check works even if you don't have a subscription to cellular service. Just set a timer for your activity, and if it runs out without you responding, your real-time location is shared with your emergency contacts.
Last year, Google launched the pulse detection feature that will hopefully save lives for anyone who suffers cardiac issues without someone close by. This year, Google launched the breathing emergency detection feature and as someone who tends to choke easily I look forward to this security blanket being approved for use in the U.S. soon.
Buy the Garmin Fenix 8 Pro View now at Amazon 1. You want to communicate while off the grid The Pixel Watch 5 has cellular support and satellite connectivity, but the satellite functionality is only for sending SOS messages in a time of extreme need. The Garmin Fenix 8 Pro, like the Apple Watch Ultra 3, can be used to send location and check in messages with family and friends via satellite connection. If you spend a lot of time trail running, hiking, camping, or fishing outside of cellular coverage, the Fenix 8 Pro may be your best choice.
Also: I compared the Apple Watch Ultra 3 to Garmin's inReach satellite connectivity - here's ...
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.