RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from The Straits Times — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 1 sourcesCOPENHAGEN/REYKJAVIK, Aug 19 - Gylfi Geirsson and Sigurbjorn Svavarsson cut British fishing trawl wires and dodged Royal Navy frigates on board small Icelandic coastguard vessels 50 years ago, using guerrilla-like tactics to keep foreign fleets out of their waters.
Iceland won the series of confrontations known as the Cod Wars, and control of those waters became the foundation of the volcanic island's economy.
Half a century later, the fear of losing control is at the heart of an August 29 referendum on whether to reopen membership talks with the European Union.
For many, the vote boils down to a trade-off: whether lower interest rates and a seat at Europe's table are worth ceding some control over the fisheries and self-determination that defined Iceland's independence since it broke away from Denmark eight decades ago.
Public debate ahead of the vote is deeply rooted in fishing rights but now also focusing on the cost of living and President Donald Trump's threats to acquire neighbouring Greenland, which has raised questions over Iceland's own defences.
"The situation as I find it today is that it's the fear that we might lose control of what we fought for," said Svavarsson, who served as a first mate on the coastguard vessel Aegir in 1976 at the height of the Cod Wars and will likely vote against restarting talks.
Iceland had applied to join the EU in 2009, in the wake of a banking collapse the previous year, and spent four years negotiating before a new eurosceptic government shelved the process in 2013.
"I will definitely say yes," said Geirsson, a radio operator during the confrontations with Britain who went on to spend 42 years in the coastguard, later representing Iceland in international fisheries negotiations.
"We cannot be like an isolated island out in the middle of nowhere. We have to have cooperation with neighbouring countries," he said, adding he would at least like to see what deal could be reached before deciding.
But if Iceland were to lose control of its fishing grounds after negotiating a deal with the EU, he would vote against joining.
"I would feel that what I did as a young man was for nothing," he said.
The ballot is not a vote on membership and any accession treaty would require a second referendum.
A Gallup poll this month found voters split on restarting talks: 46% said they would vote yes and 46% no, with 8% undecided. Polls show a majority against actually joining the bloc.
Fisheries remain central to Iceland's economy and identity alike, alongside aluminium and tourism. Much of the cod eaten in British fish and chip shops today comes from Icelandic waters, a legacy of the very dispute that Geirsson and Svavarsson fought.
"The fishery becomes a symbol of Iceland's sovereignty, as it is the foundation to Iceland's economic independence," said Eirikur Bergmann, professor of politics at Bifrost University.
Heidrun Marteinsdottir, head of industry association Fisheries Iceland, said the sector processed its catch entirely in Iceland rather than exporting it raw — a system she warned joining the EU's Common Fisheries Policy could unravel. "We have 100% of the profit in Iceland and we want to keep it that way," she said.
No foreign minister, Bergmann said, could ever sign a treaty ceding control: "That person would be expelled from the country."
For others, the stakes have little to do with fish at all. "We used to be a colony for Denmark," said Floki, a 27-year-old designer in Reykjavik, who declined to give his last name. "I think it revolves around mostly keeping control of our own choices and decisions as a country."
Iceland sits on a geopolitical bottleneck, straddling the so-called GIUK gap between Greenland, Iceland and Britain that NATO has long treated as a crucial doorway for watching Russian naval movements toward the open ocean.
The country has no army of its own, and its defence rests on NATO membership and a bilateral agreement with Washington signed in 1951.
Experts say, however, that Trump's presidency, including his tariffs and threats to acquire Greenland, has forced Icelanders to reassess assumptions once taken for granted — although the decision to hold the referendum predates Trump's second term.
"The whole Greenland thing has made Icelanders pause and re-examine the relationship with the U.S. and asking the question whether the U.S. is a reliable partner ... that has never been a concern in Iceland until now," Bergmann said.
Foreign Minister Thorgerdur Gunnarsdottir told Reuters NATO and the U.S. defence pact would remain the foundation of Iceland's security regardless of the vote's outcome, but that membership could still be "a valuable addition", particularly for economic security.
On Trump's threats to Greenland, she said: "We are disappointed with the pressure campaign waged against both Greenlanders and Denmark."
But the bigger worry, she said, lay elsewhere. "Our main concern is focused on Russia's activities, in Ukraine primarily but also their maritime activities in our waters and nearby, in the North Atlantic." REUTERS
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.