This is one outlet's own report from The Independent — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 26 sourcesThis is one outlet's own report from The Independent — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 26 sourcesA Senate committee is set to vote Thursday on whether to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress and refer him to the Justice Department for potential prosecution
Bookmark Comments Go to comments Bookmark popover Removed from bookmarks
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee is expected to vote Thursday on whether to recommend holding Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right during testimony last week.
The Republican-led panel could refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, which would decide whether to investigate or pursue contempt charges.
Fauci declined to answer questions more than 100 times during the hearing, citing his constitutional right against self-incrimination. Committee Chairman Sen. Rand Paul argued that protection no longer applied because Fauci received a presidential pardon from former President Joe Biden covering federal offenses between 2014 and January 2025.
Before the hearing, Fauci said he still faced potential legal risks despite the pardon. In a statement, he accused Paul of trying to force him into saying "something, anything" that could fulfill the senator's repeated pledge to see him "behind bars." Fauci also noted the pardon does not protect him from possible state prosecutions or from any allegations of false testimony before Congress.
Paul said Wednesday he does not plan to immediately seek a full Senate contempt vote, acknowledging such resolutions often fail to secure the required 60 votes. Instead, he said the committee will first vote on sending a recommendation to federal prosecutors, with the possibility of a Senate vote later if necessary.
The dispute could have broader implications for Congress's ability to compel testimony from witnesses who have received presidential pardons and may influence how future administrations use clemency in politically sensitive investigations.
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.