RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Rolling Stone — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sources
Earlier this week, Meta settled a lawsuit brought by a coalition of state attorneys general and the District of Columbia, which claimed that the company's products — namely Facebook and Instagram — were harmful to children. One week into trial, Meta agreed to a settlement that would require them to pay up to a $17 billion penalty, as well as enact a handful of safety precautions for accountholders 17 and under.
These stipulations are extensive. Kids will only have access to Facebook and Instagram for two hours a day, and the apps will be blocked between midnight and 6 a.m. Additionally, notifications will be silenced during school hours (8 a.m. to 3 p.m. weekdays while school is in session), cosmetic-procedure filters will be disabled, likes and reaction numbers will be banned, and kids will have the option to have a non-algorithmic scroll, meaning posts will come through from the accounts they follow in the order they were posted, harkening back to the early days of social media. They will also be required to enact some sort of age verification process, though the details of how that will work are yet to be seen.
Overall, experts say the changes are positive, so long as the company complies, and the independent auditor — another provision of the settlement — is able to do their job effectively. "Of that long list of design changes that Meta has agreed to make, many of them are aligned with research," explains Kris Perry, executive director of Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development, a nonprofit that studies the effect technology has on kids. "Those that are most aligned are the time limits, night mode, school mode, age assurance, and algorithmic feed control, autoplay, and hidden likes. Those are the ones that researchers have been hammering away at for years, saying they've created some of the most problematic use cases among children."
The important thing now, Perry says, is to start studying how these modifications will change the way kids interact with the apps. "To ensure that we're getting the product to be as safe as it can possibly be, you'd want to have a new study start right now, to establishing a baseline," she says. Editor’s picks The 250 Greatest Albums of the 21st Century So Far The 100 Best TV Episodes of All Time The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century
Candice Feinberg, a clinical psychologist and cofounder of ROWI Teen and Parent Wellness Centers, which works with families experiencing problems with social media, also sees the changes as positive. "I think they're great ideas," Feinberg says. "That's one of the things I like about the whole settlement. Every toy comes with instructions, right? The fact that we have not had any structure for kids around social media has been a problem."
She points to the algorithmic change as particularly helpful. "Not having an algorithm, it reminds me of when [social media] first came out, [it] was just our friends, so I think it's great," Feinberg says. These days, when kids click on a link — even if it was an accident, or part of researching a school assignment — they'll start to see other social posts on the same topic crop up. "If that stuff is negative, that will have a tremendous effect on your mental health," she says. "If you're constantly bombarded with negative images or fear-based statements — it's difficult for adults, let alone kids."
Mick Tobin, cofounder of the Young People's Alliance — which he describes as "like the AARP but for young people" — applauds the changes, particularly those to the algorithmic feed. "Young people I talk to go on their phones, they see one clip of, like, a person dieting, and then next thing they know, the next 10 posts are all about how to be skinny, and how skinny is in," he says. By eliminating that algorithmic drive, Tobin hopes that social media can go back to being a place where kids can interact and find community, without worrying that watching a single clip will entirely change what they see. Related Content What the Hell Is Chanty Beluga? The Song of the Summer Is Your Feed Jeremy Strong Nails Mark Zuckerberg’s Arrogance in ‘The Social Reckoning’ Trailer New Laws Aim to Protect Kids Online. Why Are Some Privacy Advocates Calling Them Censorship?
He also appreciates that they're hiding likes and reactions: "A lot of young people, including myself, grew up really conscious of, 'How many likes did my post get?' If I don't get a certain amount of likes, my value is somehow diminished."
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.