RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Scientific American — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 3 sources
The humanoid robot 'Olympics' is as ridiculous as it is impressive
Two robots beat Usain Bolt's 100-meter-dash record—but likely couldn't survive in the real world
The World Humanoid Robot Games is back for a second year, and the bots are just as unsettling and impressive as they are ridiculous and unwieldy. On the first day of the Games, two humanoid robots beat Usain Bolt's world record for the 100-meter dash—before crashing into a padded wall. Still, this five-day extravaganza showcases how far and how rapidly humanoid robots have come in even the 12 months since last year's Games.
The Games are taking place in Beijing and feature 51 events, including kickboxing, table tennis and soccer. Chinese companies produce the majority of humanoid robots, but machines representing 16 countries are participating in the Games this year, including Germany, Japan and the U.S.
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In theory, the robots' superhuman feats are super cool. In practice, a black-and-white hunk of metal sprinting into a wall looks silly. But companies such as X-Humanoid, which created one of the robots that broke Bolt's record (and got the best time overall), along with another that beat the human record for a standing high jump, are proving that they can achieve extraordinary feats of athleticism. Similar robots, especially those built for such specific purposes, however, may crash and burn (literally) when faced with the unexpectedness of human life—even in tasks as basic as folding laundry.
When a humanoid robot beat the human half-marathon record this April, Rodney Brooks, an emeritus professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told Scientific American that it's important to recognize these robots aren't actually interacting with the real world .
"When you see a performance of an [artificial intelligence] system or a robot on one thing," he said, "that fools us into thinking that it has the same general competence as a human. And that's a mistake people make."
Indeed, most of the robots that ran the 100-meter dash on Saturday crashed into the padded wall at the end. One even caught fire. Another humanoid robot in the weight lifting event crashed into the judges' table. These machines are far from having the agility, balance and mobility of a human athlete, even if they are faster or stronger in the moment.
Still, they are catching up. One humanoid robot managed to successfully play tennis against a human, anticipating unpredictable moves and showing an ability to adapt in a real-world setting. We may not expect robots at the actual Olympics anytime soon, but they sure are fast—and gaining.
Mary Randolph is a news intern at Scientific American based in New York. Her work has been featured by Smithsonian Magazine, Pew Research Center, the Local News Initiative and various local newsrooms.
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American , you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.