This is one outlet's own report from Business Insider — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 1 sourcesThis is one outlet's own report from Business Insider — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 1 sourcesGetty Images
After Kristin Darnell had her first child at 34, when her husband was 40, the plan was to try for their second in two years. But when the time came, they weren't ready.
One of the biggest concerns was the cost of childcare . Having two kids in day care at once would have been astronomically expensive, even though Darnell works in ingredient sales for the food and beverage industry, and her husband is an engineer.
The couple was eventually able to welcome their second child a little later, thanks to IUI, ending up with a three-and-a-half-year age gap between their children, who are now 6 and 3. Last year, with both kids in day care, they spent about $37,000 for the year — a little over $3,000 a month. Darnell estimated that they saved about $200 to $300 a month in childcare costs due to the wider age gap.
"Family planning's a tricky thing; you have one idea before you start and then sometimes that idea shifts," Darnell, now 40, told Business Insider.
This is the spacing dilemma, and Darnell's family isn't the only one facing it. More than a quarter of moms in their 20s expect to have their next child in two to five years, a 2026 CDC report shows. But that figure drops below 10% for moms in their 30s.
Waiting longer between kids can help spread out day care costs and mean only having one child in diapers at a time. But as millennials are having kids later , their hopes for a "golden" age gap can collide with another clock: declining fertility. If parents want more breathing room between babies, waiting can come with trade-offs and benefits.
The delicate art of cutting childcare costs
Today, many millennials tap out at having two kids . Part of that is due to financial constraints.
While many expectant parents are aware of the notoriously exorbitant childcare costs, Karen Guzzo, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina, said they can feel even more discouraged after they've had their first baby. "It's not until you actually get into the nitty-gritty yourself that you're like, 'Wow, this is really expensive,'" Guzzo, who's also the director of the Carolina Population Center, said.
For most Americans, childcare for one kid is steep. The average cost of day care ranges from roughly $7,600 to $24,000 a year, depending on the state and child's age. Things get more financially precarious with two: In nearly all US states , the average annual cost of childcare for two kids at once exceeds mortgage or rent payments. For some parents, it means paying up to $50,000 annually for day care alone.
Factor in other expenses, from car payments to student loans, and many parents start tweaking their timelines. Having a 3- to 4-year age gap between kids means having only one kid in day care or with a nanny at a time; the oldest might already be in preschool, which is offered as a free, public option in most states.
Angela Donahue, who works in product marketing in Renton, Washington, knows what it feels like on both sides of the gap. She put a 4-year age gap between her first and second child (who are now 9 and 5), and a 2-year age gap between her second and third (who is almost 3). While she preferred the wider age gap, she had her third child sooner, at 40, due to age concerns.
With her first and second kids, she said they overlapped in day care for about 6 to 9 months. But she's felt more of a financial strain with her two youngest in day care together over the last two years. Right now, it costs her and her husband roughly $5,000 a month — more than their mortgage.
"I heard some joke about when you have children, people are always like, 'You've got to save for college' — it's like, 'No, college is far away; you've got to save for day care,'" Donahue, 43, told Business Insider.
She said she's excited for the fall, when her second child will be off to kindergarten: "It's definitely really expensive, and we always celebrate when the next one is off to school."
Balancing less visible tolls
To feel comfortable having more kids, many working millennial parents want more career stability. Timing, particularly for mothers , can play a huge role.
"Had I had back-to-back babies, I think it would've taken a larger toll on my ability to advance my career," Darnell said.
Donahue also felt that spacing out her first and second children more was helpful for her career trajectory. For starters, it took her time to adjust to being a new mom. At the same time, she wanted to "keep the momentum going before taking another break," she added, something that felt easier to do when she waited longer to have her second child.
While some research finds that being a parent can improve one's reputation at work, other studies find that a "motherhood penalty" still exists. One 2026 systematic review of 79-peer reviewed journals found that mothers generally faced barriers to career advancement.
Depending on their careers, Guzzo believes mothers are "right to worry" about being out of the workforce too long. "They feel obligated to try to keep their toes in the water, so to speak, so that they aren't forgotten about or considered as not-good employees," she told Business Insider.
The fertility trade-off
Still, the biggest obstacle to spacing kids out is the fear of waiting too long.
If some mothers have their first child in their early 30s and wait 3 or 4 years, they might be trying for their second child in their late 30s or early 40s, when fertility begins to decline on average. Any money they may have saved on childcare might now go to fertility treatments . IVF, a fertility treatment in which an egg and sperm are fertilized in a lab and the resulting embryo is implanted into a woman's uterus, can cost $15,000-$20,000 per cycle without insurance.
In Darnell's case, the trade-off for waiting was that she had to undergo IUI, a typically cheaper and simpler fertility procedure involving a doctor placing concentrated sperm directly into a woman's uterus, at 37. "Knowing that the c...
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.