This is one outlet's own report from The Straits Times — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesThis is one outlet's own report from The Straits Times — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesCompanies may not label food as “zero sugar” or “sugar free” unless it contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving; Chobani’s Zero Sugar yogurt has 4 of a naturally occurring sweetener.
Listen Summarise A US appeals court ruled Chobani must face a lawsuit for falsely advertising its Zero Sugar yogurt, which contains 4 grams of allulose per serving. The FDA states products labelled "zero sugar" cannot have more than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving, including allulose as a sugar. The court found consumers could be misled by the label and returned the case to a federal judge for further proceedings. AI generated
CHICAGO – A federal appeals court revived a proposed class-action lawsuit accusing Chobani of deceiving consumers by falsely advertising some of its Greek-style yogurt as sugar free.
The 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago ruled on July 27 that consumers can try to show Chobani violated state consumer protection laws because its Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt contained four grams per serving of allulose, a naturally occurring sweetener.
The US Food and Drug Administration regulates the contents of nutrition facts panels on product packaging, and says companies may not label food as “zero sugar” or “sugar free” unless it contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per serving.
Writing for a three-judge panel, Circuit Judge Thomas Kirsch found persuasive an FDA brief that said total sugars included all monosaccharides, including allulose.
Kirsch rejected Chobani’s argument that allulose did not qualify because the FDA regulation listed only glucose, fructose, lactose and sucrose as examples.
“The agency’s brief is thorough, its reasoning is valid, and its position is consistent with earlier FDA statements about allulose and (its regulation),” Kirsch wrote.
New York-based Chobani and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment on July 28 .
The named plaintiffs James Franco and Abigail Franco said they bought Chobani Zero Sugar yogurt at a Costco near Chicago in 2023, and would not have done so or would have paid less had they known its sugar content.
Kirsch said it did not matter whether reasonable consumers would care about allulose.
“The Francos have alleged that consumers were fooled by Chobani’s labels, and given the absolute promise on Chobani’s products (sugar free), we do not find that allegation implausible,” he wrote.
The appeals court returned the case to a federal judge in Chicago.
A lawyer for the Francos declined to comment.
The decision came one day after a Manhattan federal judge rejected Chobani’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit by Danone, which makes Dannon yogurt, claiming it copied packaging and a slogan for a line of ready-to-drink cold-brew coffee.
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.