This is one outlet's own report from Business Insider — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesThis is one outlet's own report from Business Insider — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sourcesOpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Bloomberg/Getty Images
Sam Altman says one of his biggest fears is what he calls "AI authoritarianism."
That's when AI is controlled by a small number of companies or countries that gatekeep the tech.
A debate over AI access erupted last week after the release of Kimi K3, a Chinese open-source model.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says one of his biggest concerns about AI isn't whether it becomes too powerful in and of itself, but that a single company could control that power.
"I think the fight of the current moment is: Are we going to head to a world of AI authoritarianism or liberty?" Altman said on the latest episode of the "Relentless" podcast.
"Every time that humanity has traded off its liberty for safety, it's been a long-term net loss," Altman said. "We are going to put this in the hands of people. We're going to empower them. We are going to let society express its ideas and use this technology in the way they want."
It's a striking argument from the head of OpenAI , one of a small number of companies that control the world's most powerful AI models. OpenAI is also proprietary rather than open-source, meaning it doesn't share its tech.
Altman's comments are well-timed. They follow a debate that erupted in Silicon Valley and Washington last week over how much visibility the general public should have into the architecture of frontier models.
The recent release of Moonshot AI's Kimi K3, a powerful Chinese open-source model , sparked calls from some US officials to restrict access to Chinese models — and warnings from investors and startup founders that doing so could weaken global competition.
The divide extends beyond model access. US export controls already determine which countries and companies can obtain the most advanced chips and computing capacity, giving Washington significant influence over who can build cutting-edge AI.
Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia, OpenAI, Google, and many other leading tech companies signed a letter urging Washington not to restrict open-source AI.
Anthropic, OpenAI's biggest competitor and arguably the leading AI company on the planet right now, was the only major frontier lab that neither signed the letter nor publicly supported its contents. The company is known for taking a more cautious approach — arguing that increasingly capable models require stronger safeguards and tighter controls.
Altman, meanwhile, said preventing such power from becoming overly concentrated has long been central to his vision for AI, even as his company continues to keep its own models closed.
"For so long now, I have felt focused on this singular goal of abundant intelligence and a belief that incredible human prosperity will come from that, as long as we don't have a weird power concentration and kind of a new authoritarianism," he said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.