RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Newsweek — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 3 sources
0 Share Newsweek is a Trust Project member See more of our trusted coverage when you search. Prefer Newsweek on Google to see more of our trusted coverage when you search. Republican Senator John Kennedy voiced skepticism Sunday regarding the Trump administration 's newly announced civilian nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia , breaking with his party as lawmakers prepare to evaluate the deal.
Kennedy's remarks follow President Donald Trump 's announcement of the agreement and his subsequent addition of a condition requiring Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel before it can advance—a provision that has drawn criticism from both parties and cast doubt on its viability in Congress.
Newsweek reached out to the Trump administration for comment on Sunday.
The Louisiana Republican argued that pursuing a Saudi nuclear agreement while the United States remains at war with Iran sends a contradictory message.
"We're bombing a country to keep them from getting a nuclear weapon, but we're signing a deal with another country,” he said. “I know it's a commercial agreement, but that the world perceives as possibly someday leading to a nuclear weapon.”
Kennedy repeatedly emphasized that his concern was not necessarily the concept of civilian nuclear cooperation itself but the timing.
"The world's on a hair trigger," he said, arguing that countries around the world are increasingly focused on nuclear deterrence amid instability in the Middle East , Europe and elsewhere.
The comments come despite Kennedy's consistent alignment with Trump's foreign policy. During the same interview, he defended the administration's overall posture toward Iran, rejecting calls to end U.S. involvement entirely and advocating for continued economic and military pressure short of a ground war.
The proposed agreement establishes a framework for civilian nuclear cooperation between Washington and Riyadh, pending congressional review.
The Trump administration contends the pact would solidify strategic ties with a key Middle East ally while securing commercial opportunities for U.S. firms in Saudi Arabia's nuclear energy sector. Proponents argue that American participation ensures greater oversight of the kingdom's nuclear development.
However, the proposal has long divided policymakers over proliferation risks, particularly given Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's previous assertion that Saudi Arabia would pursue nuclear weapons if Tehran acquired them.
Despite Riyadh engaging in discussions over closer ties with Israel in recent years as well, Saudi Arabia has maintained that formal recognition of Israel is contingent on substantive progress toward a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the idea of Palestinian statehood as being untenable for his country's security.
Kennedy expressed doubt that the requirement can be satisfied.
"I don't think it's going to happen anyway because the president's conditioned it on Saudi Arabia recognizing Israel, and they're not going to do that," he said.
Netanyahu's office in a statement applauded the prospect of Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords as a "historic leap forward for peace in the Middle East." The statement, however, made no mention of the deal to bolster Saudi's civil nuclear program.
Appearing Sunday on ABC News' This Week , the Maryland senator criticized the retroactive addition of new conditions.
"The Trump administration, after getting the Saudis to sign it, turned around and said, 'Well, we're not going to follow through unless you normalize relations with Israel, unless you join the Abraham Accords," Van Hollen said.
He characterized the maneuver as a "bait-and-switch scheme" that created "complete whiplash" for Saudi leadership.
The agreement remains subject to a formal congressional review period under the Atomic Energy Act which gives Congress 90 days to consider it, where lawmakers are expected to scrutinize nonproliferation safeguards and regional stability implications.
With Democrats challenging the negotiation process and at least one prominent Republican questioning the timing, the administration faces an uphill battle on Capitol Hill.
Contact Newsweek editor for this story: Anthony Murray .
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.