RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from CBS News — Top — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 2 sources
A coalition of 25 states on Monday filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, alleging that it exceeded its authority in imposing a new round of sweeping tariffs last month.The import duties, enacted under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974,\u00a0target 60 economies with rates ranging from 10% to 12.5%.\u00a0"This is President Trump\u0027s third attempt to illegally impose tariffs that would make life more expensive for American families and small businesses, and this is the third time we\u0027re taking the administration to court over this misuse of power," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.\u00a0Section 301 authorizes a U.S. president to impose tariffs and other sanctions on countries found to engage in unfair trade practices. U.S. trading partners haven\u0027t done enough to crack down on imports produced with forced labor, the Trump administration said in announcing the new levies.\u00a0A White House spokesman on Monday defended the president\u0027s tariff policies."The United States is using its lawful authority to obtain the elimination of unreasonable acts, policies and practices that burden U.S. commerce," White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CBS News. "A foreign country\u0027s failure to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is unreasonable and burdens U.S. commerce, including American workers, and must be addressed. Section 301 tariffs have proven to be a legally durable tool since the president\u0027s first term, and they remain so now.""Tariffs are taxes"The states\u0027 lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of International Trade, alleges that the tariffs are not designed to address forced labor, but rather are an effort by the White House to replace levies that the Supreme Court struck down in February. The states also argue that an investigation led by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to set the stepped-up tariffs was rushed and overly broad in hiking the levies."Tariffs are taxes, and the American people cannot and should not shoulder the extra costs that come from the president\u0027s failed and illegal economic policy \u2014 no matter how much the President wants them to," Bonta said.Joining California in the suit were Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.Although U.S. tariff rates have fallen this year, the levies remain an important part of the White House\u0027s trade policies. Mr. Trump has said tariffs are necessary to revive U.S. manufacturing, reduce the nation\u0027s trade deficit and generate federal revenue.\u00a0The U.S. effective tariff rate has fallen this year to 7.4%, from 9.4%, after the Trump administration replaced temporary Section 122 duties with Section 301 tariffs on imports from 60 economies, according to Fitch Ratings.\u00a0
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.