RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Scientific American — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 12 sourcesA SpaceX rocket is about to hit the moon—these videos show what could happen
Astronomers' simulations predict what this lunar impact—and its aftermath—will look like
An errant piece of a SpaceX rocket is on a collision course with the moon , and astronomers are eagerly awaiting the chance to observe the impact in real time. New simulations from a team at the University of Texas at Austin offer a glimpse of exactly what scientists might see when the crash occurs.
The object is the upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket that launched in January 2025 to deliver two lunar landers—Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost and Japanese company ispace's Resilience, which was part of the HAKUTO-R Program. After the lunar delivery, the upper stage was supposed to fall back to Earth and burn up in the atmosphere. Instead the object, which is about the height of a five-story building, went AWOL: the rocket entered into orbit around Earth at a similar distance as the moon, setting up an eventual collision with our natural satellite.
Amateur astronomer Bill Gray, who first observed the stray rocket, has predicted that the crash will occur at around 2:35 A.M. EDT. on Wednesday. The impact is likely to hit close to the Einstein Crater, according to Gray. Because it will appear on the very edge of the sunlit side of the moon, as seen from our planet, Earthlings might get a glimpse of some of the ejecta plume—the cloud of dust and debris that the collision will create. The more than 8,800-pound piece of space junk will hit the moon at around 5,400 miles per hour and with similar energy to three tons of TNT.
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing . By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
The new simulations from UT Austin's Computational Fluid Physics Lab preview what the collision might look like when it happens.
Gray warned in a recent blog post, however, that viewers will almost certainly not be able to see the actual collision. In a recent preprint paper co-authored by Gray, astronomers explained that detecting the impact flash will likely be challenging because of the probable crash location on the moon's sunlit hemisphere. Indeed, no artificial or natural impact flashes have ever been seen on the lit surface of the moon, they wrote.
Instead scientists may be able to observe the aftermath. The plume of debris the spacecraft will create when it slams into the lunar surface could take minutes after the crash to rise far enough to become visible from the moon's limb (its outer, visible edge), according to Gray.
This simulation gives an idea of what that might look like.
This is not the first time a piece of space junk has hit the moon, and as more and more spacecraft launch into orbit and beyond, it is unlikely to be the last. Tracking such errant bits and pieces of hardware is difficult, but as NASA and other space agencies gear up to establish permanently staffed lunar bases, doing so will take on more urgency.
Claire Cameron is breaking news chief at Scientific American . Originally from Scotland, she moved to New York City in 2012. Her work has appeared in National Geographic , Slate , Inc. Magazine , Nautilus , Semafor , and elsewhere.
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American , you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.