RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Axios — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 9 sources
A federal judge rejected Ghislaine Maxwell's bid to overturn her conviction, finding her claims — including arguments based on newly released Epstein files — were frivolous.
Why it matters: The blistering opinion says the evidence of Maxwell's guilt is "overwhelming" and new evidence hurt more than helped her.
What they're saying: "Maxwell's claims are all meritless and all or almost all are frivolous," U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer wrote in a 67- page opinion.
"The vast majority are procedurally barred — either because Maxwell made and lost the same arguments on direct appeal, or because she could have made such arguments on appeal but elected not to do so."
"And the purported 'new' evidence to which Maxwell points, principally materials released under the [Epstein Files Transparency Act,] is largely irrelevant to the charges against Maxwell and does not support her claims of error."
"On the contrary, to the extent it is relevant, far from exculpating her, it incriminates her or reinforces the correctness of the legal rulings Maxwell challenges."
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.