RESOLVING THE LEDGER
This is one outlet's own report from Yahoo Sports — the article as it was filed. Other outlets are covering the same event; open the full story to compare every source side by side.
See the full story · 1 sources[BBC]
[Getty Images]
We asked for your views on Jack Grealish's future at Etihad Stadium and if he could play for the club again, after the winger returned to pre-season training but missed out on a squad place for Manchester City's pre-season tour of Hong Kong and Seoul.
Here are some of your thoughts:
June: No! City played better without him last season, so why have him back in a City shirt? He spent too much time on the grass instead of playing. So, to my mind, he is not worth having back.
Roger: I'd love to get him back playing a part in the team for this coming season. I was saddened to see John Stones leave, particularly when his heart is with the club. The same could be said for Kevin de Bruyne. These players, albeit at the end of their careers and with injury baggage, would and could have a significant impact on keeping the team spirit alive. We may have pipped Arsenal if they had still been a part of the team. Letting James Trafford go is also going to be a huge error.
Paul : We should get rid. Jack Grealish is City's worst signing since Lee Bradbury. He is a legend in his own head and he brings nothing. He wears the number 10 shirt, but he couldn't hit a barn door.
Keith: Dear Jack, put your partying on hold if you haven't already and show everyone the player we have seen and we love. Make your career blossom again, please!
AIPROPX is an independent multi-source news index — we track, compare, and connect coverage from across the web into one place you won't find anywhere else.