College men's attitudes linked to ignoring rejections from bisexual women

edited by Gaby Clark , reviewed by Alexander Pol

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

Add as preferred source Alexis Sheffield, a doctoral candidate in clinical psychology, recently published a research article about a study exploring factors that contribute to the elevated rates of sexual assault among bisexual women and to better understand that disparity.

The article stemmed from her thesis and is a topic she's passionate about. Previous research on this topic has looked at how higher rates of drinking and greater numbers of sexual partners factor into these scenarios. The study is published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence .

"I'd describe this research as hoping to look at this from a more minority stress-focused approach and working to look at it more creatively than just thinking bisexual women are drinking more and having more sexual partners," Sheffield said. "I think there's more to it than that, and I think the way it's been framed in the past can shame these women and stigmatize the group."

Sheffield conducted the research using a vignette approach. She developed a scenario that included features undergraduate women have described when discussing their own sexual assault. Men were randomly assigned to conditions that described the woman in the vignette as bisexual or straight. She asked men to rate how they would be most likely to react within the presented scenario.

The study looked at various attitudes that might influence these perceptions, including sexual dominance, casual attitudes about sex, belief in rape myths and hostility toward women. One key finding was that sexual dominance was the only factor clearly linked to justifying sexual aggression, and this result did not change based on whether the woman was bisexual or straight.

The negative blindness construct is a key component when discussing this topic. It is a deficit in men perceiving when a woman is rejecting them and being primed to notice signals that indicate a woman might be sexually interested. This is where differences appeared within the study.

The study found that men who had more casual attitudes about sex were more likely to ignore signs of disinterest—but only when the woman was described as bisexual. Men who believed in rape myths were also more likely to ignore signs of disinterest—but this effect was stronger in the bisexual condition.

The study also looked at how men judged a woman's sexual availability. Men who scored higher in hostility toward women or rape myth acceptance were more likely to assume that a woman was sexually available. This effect was stronger when the woman was bisexual, suggesting that these attitudes lead to more biased assumptions about bisexual women compared with straight women. When hostility toward women was low, men still tended to rate bisexual women as more sexually available overall, though the differences between conditions decreased with higher levels of hostility toward women.

The takeaway was that men who believed in rape myths or had casual attitudes toward sex viewed bisexual women differently from heterosexual women and tended to ignore rejections from bisexual women more often.

Sheffield hopes more studies will be conducted on this topic that can pave the way for future intervention development. "I'm not sure exactly in what way I'll continue this work, but I think there's a lot of avenues for future possibilities," Sheffield said.

Alexis Sheffield et al, College Men's Propensity for Sexual Aggression and Perceived Justifications for Sexual Aggression Toward a Heterosexual or Bisexual College Woman, Journal of Interpersonal Violence (2026). DOI: 10.1177/08862605261419459

Journal information: Journal of Interpersonal Violence

MA in English, copy editor since 2021 with experience in higher education and health content. Dedicated to trustworthy science news. Full profile →

PhD nano-engineering from Delft University. Published researcher and journal reviewer. Brings scientific insight to content standards. Full profile →

Indexed and credited by AIPROPX. Originating outlet: Phys.org. Open at source →