Fantasy Football: Should you fade CMC for Jonathan Taylor in Round 1? That's among the RB battles you'll have to figure out in…

As we get into the heart of draft season and average draft position (ADP) starts to sort itself out, we're going to see quite a few very close "ADP battles" at each position — pairs of players going back-to-back in draft consensus, who you'll have to choose between when you're on the clock. Rather than wait for that moment, we're here to sort through some of those difficult decisions, specifically at the running back position.

We'll hit the pros and cons for each player to help you form your own opinion, and then I'll deliver my own verdict on the better pick.

Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2026 NFL season

If you've got any other ADP battles you need resolved, hit me up on X (@MattOkada) and I'll give you my thoughts (or maybe include them in a future article).

Christian McCaffrey vs. Jonathan Taylor

McCaffrey: It was Christian McCaffrey, not Jahmyr Gibbs or Bijan Robinson, who led all running backs in scoring last year (365.6 fantasy points). He also led the 49ers in targets (129), receptions (102) and receiving yards (924), and added seven touchdowns through the air as well. Between his rushing volume, touchdown prowess and one-of-one production as a receiver, he has basically always been the best back in fantasy if healthy. The concern in 2026 is that he's 30 years old coming off 413 touches, which often translates to regression or injury. With an ADP particularly high in the first round, McCaffrey epitomizes high risk versus high reward.

Taylor: Annnnd it was Jonathan Taylor, not Gibbs or Robinson, who finished No. 2 behind McCaffrey last year, at 339.3 points. Surprising, I know. Taylor led the league in carries (323) and touchdowns (20), and came up just short of 2,000 total yards (1,963). But between the midseason drop-off in Indy's offense and the Achilles injury to Daniel Jones, Taylor was far better for the first 10 weeks (25.9 PPG) than the final seven (just 11.5). Consequently, with Michael Pittman Jr. gone and Jones still recovering, the big question for 2026 is which version of the Colts we can expect to get.

VERDICT: It's not usually wise to bet on an older back coming off 400+ touches, but McCaffrey feels like an exception for me, especially considering how much of his work comes through the air. I have them back-to-back in my rankings. Taylor is a bit safer, but I'm taking CMC here.

Ashton Jeanty vs. Omarion Hampton

Jeanty: In a generally abysmal situation last year — Vegas was statistically the worst offense in football — Ashton Jeanty averaged 12.8 fantasy points per game with more than 1,300 yards and double-digit touchdowns. The Raiders have made a concerted effort to fix the offensive line and the quarterback position, most notably by signing center Tyler Linderbaum and adding both Fernando Mendoza and Kirk Cousins. Having a fully healthy Brock Bowers shouldn't hurt either. All of that figures to play in Jeanty's favor, giving last year's sixth overall pick an excellent path to improved efficiency and a far higher fantasy floor.

Subscribe to Fantasy Ultra to unlock our Strategy Lab, 150+ page Draft Playbook and more!

Hampton: With 13.3 fantasy PPG, Omarion Hampton was also notably decent despite difficult circumstances — namely a porous offensive line riddled with injury and a midseason ankle injury of his own (which held him out for eight games). Heading into 2026, his environment looks far better, with a healthier and significantly upgraded O-line, a high-end franchise quarterback in Justin Herbert, a new RB-friendly offensive coordinator in Mike McDaniel and better offensive assets all around. He was also analytically excellent as a rookie, forcing a missed tackle on 30.6% of his carries and logging an 11.3% explosive run rate — no qualified running back outpaced Hampton in both those metrics.

VERDICT: While Jeanty has the edge in draft capital — and sixth-overall-pick running backs are historically dominant — Hampton's offense is far more trustworthy and explosive. I think the two are similar in talent — and have them back-to-back in my rankings (once again) — but I prefer Hampton's environment enough to take him here.

Quinshon Judkins vs. Bhayshul Tuten

Judkins: Quinshon Judkins is a curious case: he was the 36th overall pick last year and was the clear bell-cow back for most of the season (despite missing three games with an ankle injury), averaging 16.4 carries per game (eighth in the league). However, his offense, and offensive line in particular, were absolutely horrid. No team averaged fewer rushing yards before contact (0.6) or allowed their rushers to be hit behind the line of scrimmage more often (49.2%) than Cleveland. The Browns completely reworked that O-line this offseason, and added some weaponry in the passing game, so they could be much better ... but it's an admittedly big "could."

Tuten: In many ways, Tuten is the opposite case to Judkins: he was a Day 3 pick and a distant No. 2 behind Travis Etienne Jr. as a rookie, but he played in a top-10 offense that improved at the end of the year. With Etienne gone to Jacksonville, the door is open for Tuten's ascension. However, the Jaguars also signed Chris Rodriguez Jr. in free agency, and so far in camp, the two seem to be competing for priority in a legitimate committee. Tuten's fantasy outlook depends almost entirely on how consistently he will lead the backfield in Duval. If he sees 60-65% of the touches and the touchdowns, he's probably an RB2. But if Rodriguez (and fellow sophomore LeQuint Allen Jr.) vulture even a slight majority of the production, Tuten could be a bust.

VERDICT: This is the first one that's not close for me. I am one of the industry's biggest Tuten detractors, believing that Rodriguez and Allen will essentially split the touches with Tuten and that C-Rod will be heavily preferred near the goal line. Even with some remaining ...